← Back to selected work

AI infrastructure & developer tooling

Agent Memory Hub.

Context that survives a change of machine, tool, or session.

I built a shared memory and context platform for an AI development fleet: canonical history, bounded native delivery, live recall, and verified routes to the work.

Agent Memory Hub Context architecture
Collected context

Where the work happens

  • Agent memory files
  • Project instructions
  • Source provenance

Windows · macOS · Linux

One canonical store

Memory with history

  • Versioned evidence
  • Reviewable changes
  • Scoped access

Collect · compile · recall

Start small

Native context

Bounded indexes in supported agent files.

Go deeper

MCP + CLI

Full detail, history, and verified repository routes.

Before checkout workRepository identity → placement policy → live verification

My role
Creator & engineer
Focus
Agent memory · context · routing
Status
Private tool · in use

The problem

Stop rebuilding the same context.

A decision made on one computer can be missing on the next. A coding agent’s context is often trapped inside a tool’s local files, while the repository, operating rules, and source history live elsewhere.

Agent Memory Hub collects eligible memory into one versioned store. A bounded index goes into supported native agent files; full detail stays available through MCP and CLI. The agent gets a useful starting point without loading the entire history into every session.

The work

A small starting context. The full history when needed.

01

Canonical memory with provenance

Keep facts and their source history together. Versions, lifecycle states, and reason-coded changes make it possible to review how context arrived and how it changed.

02

Native files plus live recall

Supported Claude Code and Codex targets receive bounded native context. MCP and CLI provide detailed recall and operational capabilities when the task calls for them.

03

Route before acting

Resolve a repository by identity and purpose, apply the operator’s placement policy, and verify the exact checkout. A familiar directory name is not enough to select where work belongs.

How it fits together

From a local fact to useful fleet context.

  1. 01

    Collect & version

    Gather eligible memory from registered machines and preserve source provenance and prior versions in the canonical store.

  2. 02

    Compile & deliver

    Build a context slice that fits the target. Preview writes, preserve surrounding content, back up existing files, and verify the result.

  3. 03

    Recall & apply

    Use the compact context to orient the agent, then retrieve detail and verify repository placement before taking action.

Native context delivery and runtime recall are complementary paths. A compact file is a starting index, not a claim that every fact fits in a prompt.

Engineering decisions

Make context reviewable and access explicit.

One canonical writer

The hub owns canonical memory. Hub-driven collection and delivery reduce the ambiguity of competing copies and keep reach separate from an agent’s local session.

Bounded native delivery

Context has a capacity limit. Compact indexes and source-aware recall preserve access to history without pretending that a large file will always be loaded in full.

Guarded changes

Previews, backups, writeback checks, retained history, and explicit no-write outcomes make a failed or ineligible delivery visible rather than silently successful.

Scoped service capabilities

Approved capabilities let an agent use selected services without receiving vault values. Memory can refer to a credential without becoming the credential store.

  • Go
  • MCP + CLI
  • Native agent context
  • SSH fleet collection
  • Content-addressed history
  • Policy-backed routing

What this demonstrates

Memory becomes useful when it connects to the work.

AMH brings context, source history, repository placement, and scoped capabilities into a common operational layer, while preserving the distinctions between what an agent knows and what it may do.

Get in Touch

Trying to make your agent workflows dependable?

Tell me what you are trying to accomplish and where you need experienced technical ownership.